CrueltyFreeMalta.com

Cruelty-free vs Vegan… “Not Tested On Animals”

Just as “lactose-free” and “vegan” have a different meaning, “not tested on animals”, “cruelty-free” and “vegan” also have different meanings. Same goes with “organic” and “natural”. However, that’s a topic for another time maybe. Today I will once again be going through the definitions of the terms “cruelty-free” and “vegan”, and I will explain my definition of the phrase “not tested on animals” that many cosmetics brands that sell in China like to say.

1. Definition

2. WHAT CAN BE …

3. THINGS TO KEEP IN MIND:

  1. A product can be vegan but not cruelty-free.
  2. The V-Label (the green and yellow sign) only checks if the product is tested on animal and not whether the brand supports animal testing.
  3. Bunny logos are starting to lose their value. PETA are certifying brands that are selling cosmetics in China where cosmetics are at risk of being tested on animals.
  4. “Not tested on animals” text on the packaging doesn’t really mean cruelty-free. Since the EU ban, every brand that sells in the EU claims that they do not or as anyone to test on animals. However, some of these brands are selling in China. That is why I started differentiating between whether a brand tests on animals and cruelty-free. My definitions are:
    1. tests on animals … they test on animals themselves or ask third parties to do it for them.
    2. cruelty-free … whether at some point the brand had anything to do with animal testing. Either what specified in point 4.1 or they sell in China or anything new that has to be exposed.

This was a question asked in one of the popular vegan Facebook groups in Malta. I was tagged to give my feedback and the above is my reply. If you still can’t understand something please do ask further.

Comments